A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, find to make their family dwelling. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, where by improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven citizens. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying manufactured by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their setting up authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, significantly within a delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which is partially crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Assemble Visible evidence from the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones household in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all operates are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that numerous observers see as significantly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been linked to community advocacy on setting up and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the end result stays uncertain. The court docket ought to identify if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another very long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.